05
Mar

Bookies Beat Pollsters in Scottish Referendum

Bookies Beat Pollsters in Scottish Referendum

The referendum that is scottish Bookies had been predicting an 80 percent chance of a ‘no’ vote, while the polls were contradictory and inaccurate.

Did bookies understand the results for the referendum that is scottish advance, while polls were way off the mark? It sure looks that way.

Scotland has voted in which to stay the UK, with 55.3 percent of voters determining against dissolving the union that is 300-year of and going it alone. Many were surprised that the margin between winning and losing votes was because wide as ten percent; a number of polls had predicted that the result was too close to phone and that the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ campaigns were split straight down the middle.

The truth is, polls were all around the accepted destination: contradictory and fluctuating wildly. They ranged from a six-point lead for the ‘yes’ vote to a seven point lead for the ‘no’ vote in the weeks leading up to the referendum. And although they certainly were correctly predicting a ‘no’ vote on the eve of the special day, they considerably underestimated the margin of the ‘No’ victory.

Margins of Error

Maybe Not the bookies, though. They had it all figured away ages ago. While the pollsters’ predictions had been see-sawing, online sports outfit that is betting had already determined to pay out bettors who had their money on a’no’ vote several times ahead of the referendum even occurred. And while there was a whiff of a PR stunt about this announcement, it was made from the place of supreme confidence, because the markets that are betting rating the likelihood of a ‘no’ vote at around 80 percent at the least a week before the vote took place. It was a forecast that, unlike that of the heavily swinging results of the pollsters, remained stable in the lead as much as the referendum.

But why, then, are polls so unreliable when compared to the gambling markets, and just why is the news in such thrall for their wildly results that are unreliable? The polling organizations freely admit that their studies are inaccurate, often advising that we must permit a margin of mistake, commonly around five percent. Which means that in a closely fought race, such as the Scottish referendum, their information is utterly worthless. The existence of a 5 percent margin of error renders that survey useless in a race where one party, according to the polls, is leading by, say, 52 percent.

The questions that are wrong

You can find many factors that produce polls unreliable, too many, in reality, to list here. Sometimes the test size of participants is simply too low, or it is unrepresentative of the people. Often they ask leading questions, or those that conduct them are dishonest or sloppy about recording information. Nevertheless the ultimate, prevailing explanation why polls fail is which they usually ask the wrong question. Instead of asking people who they’ll vote for, they heart of vegas casino slots must be asking the question that the bookies always ask: ‘Who do you consider will win?’

Research conducted by Professor Justin Wolfers implies that this question yields better forecasts, because, to quote Wolfers, it ‘leads them to also reflect on the opinions of those because it may yield more honest answers. around them, and maybe also’

Dishonest Responses

Those interviewed by pollsters are far more likely to express their support for change, while suppressing their concerns about the possible negative consequences in a case such as the Scottish referendum, where there is a large and popular movement for change. When expected about a problem on the location, it’s easier to express the perceived popular view. For the Scots, a ‘yes’ vote might express the attractive proposition of severing ties with a remote and unpopular government in Westminster, but it also means uncertainty and feasible chaos that is economic.

As Wolfers claims, ‘There is a tendency that is historical polling to overstate the reality of success of referendums, possibly because we are more prepared to share with pollsters we will vote for change than to do so. Such biases are less likely to want to distort polls that ask people who they think will win. Indeed, in providing their expectations, some respondents may even mirror on whether or not they believe present polling.

Simply speaking, when asked whether they’d vote for an separate Scotland, a substantial range Scots evidently lied. Gamblers, on the other hand, were brutally honest.

Suffolk Downs to Close After Wynn Everett License Choose

Suffolk Downs in happier times: Horseracing attendance has fallen by 40 per cent in the past few years. Now the choice of Wynn Everett for the East Massachusetts casino permit has sealed the racetrack’s fate.(Image: bloodhorse.com)

Suffolk Downs, the historic thoroughbred horseracing track in East Boston, is to close, officials have established. Meanwhile, Wynn Resorts celebrates securing the sole East Massachusetts casino license for his or her Wynn Everett project, that may see the construction of a $1.2 billion casino resort in Everett, barring a casino that is unlikely vote in November.

Suffolk Downs is be the casualty that is first of week’s selection procedure. In favoring the Wynn bid over compared to the Mohegan Sun’s, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission has hammered the nail that is final the coffin of thoroughbred horseracing in the state. Suffolk is one of just two horseracing tracks in Massachusetts, and the only one exclusively for thoroughbreds.

Mohegan Sun’s proposed resort was to have been built on land owned by Suffolk Downs in Revere, and the racetrack had pledged to continue horseracing there for at least 15 years should Mohegan Sun win the bid. However, the Commission, which voted 3:1 against Mohegan Sun, decided that the Wynn proposal offered better possible to produce jobs and start up brand new avenues of revenue for their state. Suffolk Downs COO Chip Tuttle made the statement that the track wouldn’t normally be able to carry on soon after the Gaming Commission’s choice had been made general public.

End associated with the Track

‘We are extraordinarily disappointed as this course of action is likely to cost the Commonwealth a large number of jobs, small company and family farms,’ Tuttle said. ‘ We are going to be meeting with workers and horsemen over the next several times to talk about how exactly we wind down racing operations, as a legacy that is 79-year of racing in Massachusetts will be coming to a finish, resulting in unemployment and uncertainty for many hardworking individuals.’

The industry has been hit with a 40 per cent lowering of the past few years and Suffolk’s closure will probably influence hundreds of thoroughbred breeders, owners, farriers and others whom make their living in Massachusetts horseracing industry. The necessity to safeguard Suffolk Downs ended up being among the primary motivations for the 2011 Gambling Act, which expanded casino gaming in Massachusetts and created the Massachusetts that is east casino, and the choice to go with Wynn has angered many individuals.

‘Today’s decision to honor the license to Everett effectively put several hundred of my constituents away from work,’ said Representative RoseLee Vincent, a Revere Democrat. ‘It is disturbing that the commission could minimize the jobs of 800 hardworking people.’

Rich History

Many industry workers feel betrayed by politicians and the Gaming Commission. ‘What’s depressing is we worked so very hard to have that gaming bill passed with all the indisputable fact that it would definitely conserve the farms and save racing in Massachusetts,’ said George F. Brown, the owner and supervisor of the breeding farm, who added that the ruling would ‘probably just about … placed every one of the farms like mine out of business.’

Suffolk Downs opened in 1935, right after parimutuel betting had been legalized in the state. In 1937, Seabiscuit won the Massachusetts Handicap right here, breaking the history along the way. The race was attended by 40,000 individuals. Through the years, the track has hosted events featuring legendary racehorses like Whirlaway, Funny Cide, and Cigar. In 1966, the Beatles played a concert right here in the track’s infield in front side of 24,000 screaming fans.

Ultimately, though, a history that is richn’t enough to save your self Suffolk Downs, and, ironically and poignantly, the bill that has been made to rescue this famous old racetrack appears to have killed it.

Donald Trump Poised to Simply Take Back Trump Atlantic City Casinos

Is Donald Trump seriously interested in saving Atlantic City or is he just interested in publicity? (Image: AP)

Can Donald Trump save Atlantic City? And can he?

The word from The Donald is he says he’s exactly what AC has been missing all these years that he can, and what’s more. This week and its non-Donald-related owner Trump Entertainment prepared to file for bankruptcy, the billionaire real estate mogul announced that he is ‘looking into’ mounting a rescue attempt as the Trump Plaza shuttered its doors.

Expected by the Press of Atlantic City whether he would help to save The Trump Plaza as well as its at-risk sister property, the Trump Taj Mahal, the Donald said, ‘We’ll see what happens. If I can assist the people of Atlantic City I’ll do it.’

Later on, on Twitter, and clearly warming to his theme, Trump said: ‘we left Atlantic City years back, good timing. Now we may buy back in, at reduced price, to save your self Plaza & Taj. They were run defectively by funds!’

Trump was hugely critical of his company that is former Trump in recent months, and has sought to distance himself from its stricken casino properties. In July, possibly catching wind of impending bankruptcy, he launched legal procedures to have his name removed through the gambling enterprises so that they can safeguard their brand, of which he’s hugely protective.

Sentimental Side?

‘Since Mr. Trump left Atlantic City many years back,’ states the lawsuit, ‘the license entities have allowed the casino properties to fall under an utter state of disrepair and have otherwise unsuccessful to operate and manage the casino properties in accordance with the high criteria of quality and luxury needed under the license agreement.’

Trump left the nj casino industry in ’09, and Trump Entertainment was bought out by a group of hedge fund managers and bondholders that are corporate who were permitted to retain the brand name in return for a 10 per cent ownership stake for Trump in the reorganized business. He has had nothing related to the gambling enterprises’ day-to-day operations since that time.

‘Does anyone notice that Atlantic City lost its magic once I left years ago,’ Trump tweeted. ‘It is indeed unfortunate to see just what has happened to Atlantic City. So numerous decisions that are bad the pols through the years: airport, convention center, etc.’

Into the early ’80s, Trump embarked for a project that is joint getaway Inn and Harrahs to build the Holiday Inn Casino Hotel. It absolutely was completed in 1984, and he quickly bought out his company partners and renamed the property the Trump Plaza. It was the casino that is first ever owned, and this week it closed. Could it be that the notoriously cold-blooded property developer has a side that is sentimental? Or perhaps is it, just, as many people think, that he can’t resist some publicity that is good?

Publicity Stunt a Possibility

Senator Jim Whelan (D-Atlantic) believes in the explanation that is latter.

‘Donald is just a guy who likes to see his name in the paper,’ he stated. ‘He’s never ever been shy about searching for publicity or publicity that is obtaining. The question is whether this is more publicity for Donald or whether he’s intent on coming back to Atlantic City in a way that is real. We are going to see down the road. Is Donald Trump looking to get some publicity, or is he serious? And if he’s serious, come on in and write some checks.’

‘I can see Donald’s ego wanting him to come back as a savior,’ consented consultant that is gaming Norton. ‘ I don’t think Donald’s title would assist the casinos that much,’ he said. ‘Our problem is, other casinos have opened up and take off traffic from Philadelphia and New York.’

Intriguingly, and also as if to spite the naysayers, the Trump’s helicopter was seen arriving on the roof for the Taj on Tuesday. Could it be that Trump is really prepared to put his cash where his mouth is?