Guinness World Record for Exorbitant Crown Cocktail is Shaken, Not Stirred, as Back Story Emerges
‘The Winston’ cocktail, made out of 1858 classic cognac by a celebrity mixologist at the Crown Melbourne, was part of a bungled publicity stunt that cost the casino more than a drink.
The Crown Casino in Melbourne might be stripped of a Guinness World Record due to a bizarre tale of a cheating Kiwi millionaire, a $32 million casino scam, a narrowly averted PR catastrophe, and the planet’s priciest free cocktail.
The saga begins in September 2013, at the Crown Casino’s Club 23, a bar co-owned by Crown owner James Packer, legendary cricketer that is retired Warne, and previous WSOP Main Event champ Joe Hachem.
Australian media and officials from the Guinness Book of reports had collected to witness high-roller businessman Giang Nguyen imbibe the world’s most expensive cocktail.
‘The Churchill,’ was made with 1858-vintage Croizet Cuvee Leonie cognac, a measure of Chartreuse VEP Vert (a French herbal-infused liqueur produced by monks) and splash of Angostura Bitters, among other ridiculously expensive and notably odd components. The drink can be so named as they planned the D-Day landings during WWII because it was purportedly the beverage of choice for PM Winston Churchill and President Dwight Eisenhower.
Not A inexpensive Date
The cost was AU$12,500, approximately US$9,500, hence all of the hullabaloo and also the guy from Guinness because of the clipboard keeping view.
But oddly, as current media made note, Nguyen looked uncomfortable, took one sip, declared that it is ‘good’ and hurried down into the leaving about $8000-worth of vintage booze unsipped night. The question is why.
Rewind to February of 2013. Crown announced via pr release that New Zealand millionaire James Manning will be the man to cough up five figures for the impossibly luxe cocktail that is new. Manning was indeed lured to Crown by a member of the VIP services staff, the department that is faced with attracting and keeping high-rolling whales.
The plan was that Manning would come to Crown, gamble big and lose big, before obliging the casino by taking component in their little publicity stunt. What could possibly make a mistake?
What Crown didn’t understand was that Manning had been a cheat that is skilled card counter, and had employed somebody on the inside to signal information to him. Making use of a technique that the casino hasn’t fully elaborated upon, Manning took Crown for $32 million in just eight hands of blackjack.
‘We could not believe what he had won and a number of the bets he placed were very, very suspicious,’ a former crown executive told the Sydney Morning Herald. ‘Those eight hands, in specific … he bet up against the chances and won, so one of our surveillance guys made a decision to have a closer look.’
A closer appearance revealed that Manning and their accomplice, the guy from the VIP department who had invited him in the place that is first no less, were in cahoots, operating a complex scam to cheat the casino.
Manning was immediately turned out of his room in the middle of the evening and barred for eternity through the property. Due to the fact vast majority associated with the cash had not yet been paid out, Crown selected not to press fees, but it left the PR department in a bit of a pickle.
‘Having James Manning done for the gambling heist just before the event wasn’t in the script,’ said a member that is former of’s PR team. ‘the cognac was had by us, we’d the event organized, we just didn’t have a buyer. We had been in a awful bind.’
The truth is, then, that Nguyen had been a shill, a buddy of the management, bussed in at the minute that is last. The promotion stunt ended up being all for show plus the Crown would reimburse him the complete amount the morning that is next.
Essentially, Nguyen got a sip of the world’s most cocktail that is expensive clear of Crown, in which he wasn’t also a top model or Mariah Carey.
Macau Revenues Down Again, But Some See Signs Of Hope
Macau’s gaming industry continues to struggle, though analysts see some signs of the recovery. (Image: Ed Jones/AFP/Getty Photos)
Macau’s gaming revenues are continuing their seemingly endless tumble, falling again in June to make it 13 straight months of decrease for the enclave that is chinese.
However, not all of this news coming out of Macau had been bad for the casinos, suggesting that although the present trends are painful, there could be hope on the horizon that things could enhance in the future that is not-too-distant.
First, however, there is the news that is bad.
Macau’s Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau reported that gambling enterprises within the territory took in under $2.2 billion in gaming revenue in June, down 36 percent when compared with the period that is same year earlier.
That is the lowest figure for Macau since November 2010.
Overall, annual gaming revenues are down about 37 percent in 2015 compared to the first half a year of final year.
Incremental Improvement Provides Some Hope
Still, the June figures were slightly better than the projections of some analysts.
‘Although a 36 per cent year-over-year decline is definately not healthy, we find it encouraging the theme of modest sequential comparison improvement remains on trend,’ said gaming analyst Steven Wieczynski of Stifel Nicolaus Capital Markets.
In other words, the very fact that things have been slightly less terrible for Macau recently is one step within the right direction. There are other indications that revenues could start to tick backup this summer, too.
Gaming revenues were really up over the past nine days for the month, which could be related to the start of the summer tourism season.
If those increases carry on into July, the annual numbers could start to look better for Macau, especially considering that the final few months of 2014 were especially brutal for the casinos there.
Relaxed Visitation Rules Could Encourage More Tourism
A bit in addition, the Chinese government finally seems to be stepping in to help Macau. As of Wednesday, visitation rules have been relaxed, and mainland Chinese residents can now see Macau twice per month instead than twice per every 60 day period. The maximum amount of any one stay has also increased from five days to seven.
That choice caused casino that is many to surge this week. Four of five casino stocks listed in Hong Kong saw their biggest gains into the past four years, including MGM China, Wynn Macau, and Sands China.
Even in the event the specific effect of this decision is fairly tiny, it would likely signal an improvement in policy from the mainland government that is chinese which hurt Macau’s gaming industry significantly with its anti-corruption policies that cut much for the cash movement towards the territory.
Analysts anticipate more supportive measures from China later on in 2015, and regardless if none of these modifications are dramatic, they might have a good effect that is cumulative.
But not every one of the news taken from Macau is positive. The Macau federal government is introducing a full smoking ban in its legislature this week. That bill is probably be passed later on this 12 months, and could be implemented when early next year.
In line with the impact that a ban on smoking in mass market casino areas had, analysts believe that this brand new ban, which would expand to more private gaming areas, could similarly damage spending by high rollers, with some predicting a 10 to 15 percent reduction in revenues because associated with the smoking cigarettes prohibition.
Tennis Match Fixing Problems Consistently Make Headlines
Few would accuse anyone of match fixing at Wimbledon, but numerous state that the practice is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller activities. (Image: Wikipedia)
Tennis was faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the infamous match between Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of the general public to questions concerning the integrity of matches in certain smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always is apparently something lurking beneath the activity’s surface.
Those concerns were aired again this week in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and find out just how much of a issue match fixing is for the sport.
One 2014 research cited in that story estimated that one percent of all tournament that is first-round may be fixed, which will suggest a lot more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other quotes and guesses have suggested that multiple matches each week could possibly be fixed, though that’s still a really tiny percentage of most professional tennis matches.
Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players
What makes tennis therefore vulnerable to match fixing?
There are a variety of factors, many of which help explain why the issue seems most prominent at the lower quantities of the expert ranks.
First, there’s the obvious fact that tennis ( at jugar indian dreaming slot least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.
There is only one person that needs to be bribed in order getting them to throw a match (the exact same issue that leads numerous to worry widespread integrity dilemmas in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to select up the slack for the player who is struggling.
That stated, no body is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.
For one, there is the fact these matches have an intense number of scrutiny on them; maybe even more importantly, though, star tennis players are extremely well compensated, meaning it would price anybody attempting to repair a match at that level an exorbitant quantity of money, if it may be done at all.
That’s maybe not to say that nobody tries. Even Novak Djokovic has told a tale of being provided $100,000 to repair a match back in 2006.
But players in the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and may even lose cash in a provided competition after travel and coaching expenses are taken into consideration.
That means they are prime targets for gamblers trying to fix a match.
Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result
Another issue is the fact gamblers do not even have to repair a match that is entire find ways to profit.
Because numerous gambling sites and bookmakers provide betting on sets or also individual games, players can achieve agreements to permit certain events to occur at the best times to satisfy gamblers while nevertheless playing to win overall.
‘One particular fix that is common be to divide the first two sets to a predetermined script, then play the third set fairly to find out which player advances,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.
The Tennis Integrity Unit is the physical human anatomy tasked with rooting out such issues, and they will have sometimes made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption guidelines, though not for match-fixing.
But no real matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is not likely to change the culture that enables lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who would like to make certain bets.
That would require a change that is complete exactly how compensation works up and down the various degrees of expert tennis, something which probably won’t happen any time soon.