Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General

While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everyone has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition in an effort to force a vote that is statewide set up casino projects will be able to move ahead.

People who are against the casinos that are new able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But regrettably for them, the state solicitor but a stop to your move, saying that the ballot question wouldn’t be legal under the state’s ballot effort process.

Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question

The ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48 under the current state Constitution. That article not just outlines the process for getting a relevant concern in the ballot, but also establishes what can and may not be included in such concerns. One of the rules for proposals states that they cannot interfere with an entity’s ‘right to receive settlement for personal property appropriated to public use’.

According to state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the question were to be authorized by the public, thus closing the casino deals immediately, it might simply take the casino developers’ contract rights away without the payment. It would also ‘impair the implied agreements’ between the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and the ones designers, who have already paid millions in application fees towards the state.

The action arrived as a surprise to those who had put the petition together, because of the man whom filed the proposal saying he had been ‘disappointed’ within the ruling.

‘We completely expected to be today that is certified’ said John F. Ribeiro, chairman of the Committee to Repeal the Casino Deal. ‘ This is something which should be voted on by the individuals of the Commonwealth.’

Ribeiro said that he is now considering their options, including an appeal that is possible Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court.

State Expanding Gambling

Massachusetts authorized a plan to expand gambling in the state in order to make it more competitive in the casino that is quickly growing regarding the northeastern united states of america. Regulations will allow for three full-scale resort gambling enterprises in Massachusetts, with one permit being allowed in all of three areas. a fourth slots-only facility would be allowed at a horse-racing track that is existing. Local towns and cities would have to achieve agreements with casino developers so that you can allow jobs to move forward.

The method had been a contentious one. Tough battles took spot over the potential to develop casinos in many cities and towns throughout the state, including in Boston, where candidates operating for the mayoral slot have had to simply take edges on not merely when they support building a casino in the city, but also how the city should vote on the project.

The anti-gambling initiative wasn’t the only ballot measure submitted for the 2014 ballot. An overall total of 28 proposals were certified, including three constitutional amendments that will not be in the ballot until at least 2016. The casino ban was among five proposals which were rejected for different reasons.

‘Ballot initiatives allow citizens across the Commonwealth to engage in the directly process of democracy,’ said Attorney General Martha Coakley. ‘Our decisions do not mirror any viewpoint on the merits or values of the petitions, but simply that the requirements that are constitutional [or are not] met.’

Deutsche Telekom Applies for German Sports Betting License

Deutsche-Telekom has announced curiosity about using for one of Germany’s limited online gambling licenses.

The limited amount of licenses obtainable in Germany’s notoriously tightly regulated online gambling marketplace has already created fierce competition among online gaming operators. However now a major telecommunications business has applied for a license themselves, further tightening industry for the few licenses available.

May or May Well Not Use License

Deutsche Telekom announced this week they have sent applications for a sports betting permit in Germany. The company said that the procedure is at an extremely early stage, and that there surely is no certainty that they will ever even create a working on line gambling business. The application happens to be being reviewed by the Interior Ministry of Hesse, a state that is german.

Deutsche Telekom would definitely be a formidable title in Germany’s online gambling landscape if they did proceed by having a sports site that is betting. Based in Bonn, the business is really a worldwide telecommunications giant that was formerly owned entirely by the state. The German government nevertheless holds a more than 30 % stake in the company, both directly and through the national government bank.

Germany has been struggling to craft an online gambling policy that allows them to steadfastly keep up tight control over the industry in the country, while also passing muster with the European Union. For many years, there clearly was virtually no online that is regulated gambling Germany, with only wagering on horse race allowed. But this was challenged by the Commission that is european Germany to declare that they would revisit their laws.

State and Federal Legislation Issues

While the rest of Germany’s states debated exactly how they would alter the present gambling regulations, the state of Schleswig-Holstein decided that it would just take action by itself. In late 2011, the state passed legislation that would allow companies to use for licenses for on-line poker, on-line casino games and online sports wagering.

That news had been met with excitement by online gambling operators, whom quickly moved to utilize for licenses in the German state. In all, Schleswig-Holstein issued 23 sports licenses that are betting 13 casino and poker licenses.

However the rest of Germany eventually agreed on a gambling reform plan albeit the one that ended up beingn’t almost as liberal as the steps that Schleswig-Holstein had taken. The other fifteen states that are german to a plan just months after Schleswig-Holstein had begun to issue licenses, allowing for 20 sports betting licenses become awarded nationally. In addition, there would be a 5 percent product sales tax on online gambling levied on the companies who obtained these licenses.

By very early 2013, Schleswig-Holstein had agreed to join the remainder of Germany and adopt the national recreations gambling licensing plan. However, that don’t imply that the licenses that had previously been granted by their state were voided, and also the companies holding those licenses are required to be valid for another six years without counting against the limit that is national.

Germany consulted with all the European Court of Justice on whether the legislation that is federal sufficiently liberalized to comply with EU law, with the European Gaming and Betting Association stating that it did not meet European demands. In the meantime, the European Commission has issued an opinion expressing dissatisfaction in Schleswig-Holstein’s decision to pull right back from its licensing program.

Despite the rapid changes, a few major organizations have expressed curiosity about being licensed by the government that is german. Nevertheless, the sluggish rate for the licensing program and the fact that these firms might have to give up any poker or casino operations in the united kingdom are making it unclear exactly what companies if any will ultimately be certified.

European Union On Line Gambling Ops Trying to Form Regulations

The Parliament of the eu is hammering out a regulatory framework for the Union’s online gambling operators to utilize as an umbrella

The European Parliament (EP) is calling upon the European Union (EU) to do this, with the goal of ensuring respect for European trade principles, because well as cooperation between various countries’ gambling regulators. The call to action follows an online gambling report that was drawn up and submitted by Member of European Parliament Ashley Fox, which the EP has decided to adopt.

European Union Takes Suggestions Under Advisement

Fox’s report initially recommended the licensing that is EU-wide of operators, but further amendments have since generated the recommendation to keep national authorities to manage their own countries’ online gambling, yet with more cooperation between countries with regards to customer protection and money laundering.

The report also encourages member states of the eu to share blacklists of operators, myfreepokies.com also to give consideration to access that is blocking illegal web sites to help strengthen protection of customers.

Both trade figures the Remote Gambling Association and the European Gaming and Betting Association each welcomed the Parliamentary choice to look at the report, yet the Remote Gambling Association (RGA) had been critical for the use of wording which was selected to describe online betting operators, saying ‘that in places it has unsubstantiated views about the online gambling sector and these may actually are used to justify the demand unwarranted restrictions on the freedoms normally related to the Internal Market.’

‘Unfortunately, the resolution has been unduly affected by those members associated with Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) Committee whom are opposed to the opening of markets to licensed sector that is private gambling companies,’ included the RGA. ‘In doing so they have duplicated flawed consumer protection arguments to justify the retention of barriers to market entry.’

Remote Gambling Association Approves

But, the RGA ended up being inviting of the decision itself, expressing approval towards such attributes associated with the report as continued infringement proceedings against certain Member States, the promotion of cooperation between regulators on a nationwide scale, further transparency to licensing procedures, and a decrease in unneeded administrative procedures which trigger burden.

For the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), who were more appeased by your decision, importance was given to delivering on the promises produced by European Commissioner Michel Barnier for internal market and services, and to ensure action is taken against EU member states whom do not comply utilizing the rules.

‘ Right during the time when most member states are re-regulating their markets, the possibility of no action would not just undermine the work associated with European Commission, but create further legal uncertainty for European licensed operators,’ stated the EGBA in response towards the decision for the EP.

‘Today’s vote, that is the report that is third gambling into the mandate of the European Parliament, shows once more the growing interest of the EU to take action and responsibility in this area,’ said Secretary General of the EGBA Maarten Haijer. ‘ Even though the report does not call for harmonization of the sector yet, it supports new EU action in numerous areas such as customer e-verification and improved border cooperation that is cross. These initiatives are necessary to streamline identification procedures, simplify licensing procedures and eliminate unneeded burden that is administrative cross-border operatives.’

All in all, it seems that the trade authorities are pleased during the decision to allow countries to modify their own online gambling industries, and will welcome further cooperation and transparency to procedures later on, making it simpler to allow them to conduct their company and continue to increase consumer protection.